|
Post by bixaorellana on Jul 4, 2012 2:31:27 GMT
I was meeting someone in the zócalo this past Sunday, the day that Mexico turned out to vote for a new president, congressmen, & senators, among other things. Naturally I brought the camera & strolled around before meeting my friend. Pretty much nothing was going on, although I did find a small both and this sign: A few people were milling around this marquee. An official told me it was there to receive complaints of voting irregularities. He gestured vaguely and said there was info on the regular voting places "over there". It was Mexico and there were people, so of course there were food vendors ~ And speaking of food, I wandered over to this much larger marquee, thinking it was where the rest of the voting information was, only to find it was a kermess for the cathedral. The lack of action was a little disappointing, but no matter, as it was a pretty day ~
|
|
|
Post by bixaorellana on Jul 4, 2012 2:32:06 GMT
The last picture above was taken at 11:36 a.m. After that I sat with my friend under the arches of the zócalo for a while, drinking coffee & yakking. We finally left, wandering north through the alameda -- the big open area in front of the cathedral. We parted ways there, & I decided to make a loop back to the zócalo, still hoping for a photo-op. Almost back to the denunciation marquee, I pass this little booth sporting duplicate lists of the aforementioned "away" voting sites. Taken at 1:22 ~ Suddenly I hear loud shouting. 1:24 ~ A man is inside the marquee, yelling about fraud and corruption. A large crowd gathers ~ The man begins a chant of "el pueblo unido / jamás será vencido", with the crowd joining in, then continues his speechifying. I ask several people in the crowd what's going on & they all say they don't know. This sign has appeared on the outside of the marquee since I was here before, listing a few more venues for those voting outside their districts ~ The man holding the piece of paper is the one speaking. This article says that Zenen Bravo, leader of the APPO led the demonstration at the marquee, but I don't think either one of the men in the long-sleeved blue shirts is Bravo. At any rate, the shouting continues & no one can tell me what it's about. I leave the milling throng & walk towards the northwest corner of the zócalo arches. There I see some people I know, but all they've heard about as a source for the discontent is a rumor that voting sites have run out of ballots. It says something about the number of protests we have here that people are chatting, eating, & drinking coffee just a few yards away from firebrand shouting. I too have become indifferent to the noise, since I can't find out why, so start walking south in front of the arches. I get almost to the end when suddenly there are men running in my direction, some in pursuit of one individual, with several journalists running backward trying to capture it on camera. It takes me a moment to react, plus I'm interested in what's happening. The guy being pursued is wearing a white polo shirt and carrying some kind of a bag. (I was later told that his shirt bore the IFE -- Federal Electoral Institute -- emblem, but can't corroborate that.) He was grabbed and pulled back in the direction they'd come.
|
|
|
Post by bixaorellana on Jul 4, 2012 2:32:50 GMT
There's a great deal of noise coming from under the arches now, with the activity massed in the middle. Here you can finally see the man in the light blue shirt again, well, the top of his head -- directly beneath the stairs. Also, looking at the man underneath the first hanging light on the left hand side, that could be Bravo. He's speaking, but it's impossible to hear what he's saying. Meanwhile, there are shouts of "Sacalos! Sacalos! Sacalos por los huevos!" (Take them out! Take them out! Take them out by the balls!)
|
|
|
Post by bixaorellana on Jul 4, 2012 2:33:17 GMT
The media is out in force, and has been since the initial shouting at the denuciation marquee. I go back toward where my acquaintances were sitting earlier. They're still there, as who'd want to miss any of this? Now police of all types -- traffic, tourism, regular, SWAT -- are queuing up against the wall from the doorway where the man is speaking to the north end of the arches. You can't detect much tension on the part of the cops, & they're making no attempt to control the crowd in any way. You can see the businesses hastily pulled down their shutters when the melee began. The police have made a double line. Men and women are emerging from the café & passing between them. And that's pretty much it! I wander over to the north end of those arches & fall into conversation with a tall guy on a bicycle, where I finally learn what the fuss was about. It seems the voting venues for those out of their districts had no ballots, effectively keeping those people from voting. The bike guy tells me he's from Durango & has been going from special balloting place to special balloting place trying to vote, but to no avail. storify.com/univisionnews/mexico-decides-today-who-will-be-the-next-presidenamericasmexico.blogspot.mx/2012/07/protest-of-lack-of-ballots-in-special.htmlAnd some local coverage, if you read Spanish. Those two articles in English & these in Spanish will have the words "Pontius Pilate" floating through your heads. www.zocalo.com.mx/seccion/articulo/lesionan-a-mp-en-oaxaca-por-falta-de-boletaswww.oaxacaenpiedelucha.info/noticias-generales/policias-rescatan-a-representante-de-la-fepade-en-oaxaca Time to go home, but not before something different crosses my path. The kid sees me see it & raise my camera. Can you find Waldo? And that's it for downtown Oaxaca. Homeward bound, I pass the tightly closed Casa del Mescal, as there's been no alcohol sold anywhere since midnight last night.
|
|
|
Post by bixaorellana on Jul 4, 2012 2:33:45 GMT
On the way home, I pass by Melissa's school (#s28 thru 31), where a voting marquee has been set up. It's supposed to be a big no-no to take pictures of the insides of these voting places, plus I guess it could make people paranoid. I'm sitting fairly far away on a park bench. Moving around, hoping to find evidence of skullduggery, or at least to better observe the process ~ Several of these signs were places on the fence railings of the school previous to election day ~ This nice lad was accompanying his family to the voting place. He kindly let me take a picture of his pet. And now it's time for me to go home .................... completely gratuitous video ~~
|
|
|
Post by tod2 on Jul 4, 2012 8:04:30 GMT
Oh Bixa, first I must shed a tear for that poor armadillo, I'm sorry but when people make pets out of UN-domesticated animals it distresses me...more tears Lets get to your excellent report on the voting. It rings of South African voting systems! Same old 'no voting papers delivered'. Is it because the people in charge are just incompetents? Here they are!
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 4, 2012 10:14:28 GMT
What a really cool idea for a thread Bixa. I thoroughly enjoyed seeing this. Yes, that poor armadillo....but, talk about local color!!!! It was great seeing everyday people, and I loved the food vendors. (here in NOLA there have been candidates running for office who have been known to personally bring free food into the voting polls, yes, it's true. When I served as Poll Commissioner for several years, I confronted one and ran her off. I wasn't the most popular person in the polling place that day.... ) The armed officers, Federali's or whatever they're called did lend a menacing air to things in a really creepy way. Thanks for this. Great shots of downtown Oaxaca.
|
|
|
Post by bixaorellana on Jul 5, 2012 6:06:15 GMT
Thanks, ladies! Yeah, I was beaming escape vibes at that poor little armored beastie while I took its picture. Tod, the belief is that it's more corruption than incompetence. There's a discussion of the irregularities in this thread: anyportinastorm.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=mexico&action=display&thread=5958&page=1And in that line ~~ gee, Casimira, why don't I have any trouble believing that candidates in N.O. know the way the to the voters' hearts is through their stomachs? ;D In a note related to that & to Tod's question, by this time you all may have seen this news story: Feeding suspicion of large-scale vote-buying were scenes of thousands of people rushing to grocery stores this week to redeem pre-paid gift cards they said the PRI had given them ahead of the election. Several told reporters they had been told to turn in a photocopy of their voter ID card in order to get the gift cards.You'll note in the pics that no one was particularly bothered by the robo-cops. That's because they seem to suit up like that for almost any occasion. I'd really like it if they'd act a little more conscious of their weaponry. There's nothing like riding in a car behind a pick-up truck full of guys sitting on the rim of the bed, casually holding their weapons as they chat while the truck jounces along. And the protests continue. There was a march earlier this evening protesting the election results. Omar Nunez, who posted this on his facebook page, kindly gave me permission to use it here: "turn off the tv & turn on your consciousness" Peña-Nieto is married to a soap opera star on the huge network Televisa. There is evidence that Televisa promoted his campaign in a shadowy way. (the story was broken by The Guardian, UK) A little later, this march moved on to the alameda where a Televisa host was to do a presentation. Not a good day for Televisa to show up! The area shown in this video is that in the pictures above where the info booths were set up.
|
|
|
Post by lugg on Jul 6, 2012 5:47:23 GMT
Fascinating Bixa - ( anyportinastorm.proboards.com/ind....ead=5958&page=1) It really brought the discussions on the thread above to life for me No 3 of #4 - Armed soldiers joking with members of the public standing close - I think I may have stepped back somewhat.
|
|
|
Post by nycgirl on Jul 7, 2012 3:25:48 GMT
This is excellent coverage, Bixa. It's so frustrating to hear about the blatant disenfranchisement of citizens, though.
On another note, I like the photo of the kid smiling for the camera with the pant-less old guy behind him.
|
|
|
Post by bixaorellana on Jul 7, 2012 6:35:17 GMT
Thanks, ladies. Lugg, if you step back you might miss seeing something! ;D NYCG, it is blatant, but some of the problems are being addressed, it seems. Some votes are being recounted. For instance, some voting locations reported more votes cast that there were registered voters in the district. There is an allegation that in one Veracruz location, 300% of the registered voters cast ballots. In Oaxaca, there was an unprecedented turnout of almost 62% of voters. Oaxaca gave López Obrador 43.36% of its vote. After the recount, Peña-Nieto lost 9, 142 votes. There's a mega-march scheduled tomorrow in the city of Oaxaca in opposition to Peña-Nieto & his party. This may not be the most unbiased report (but what is?), but quite illuminating, nonetheless: www.wsws.org/articles/2012/jul2012/mexi-j07.shtml& just to provide balance: www.brecorder.com/general-news/172/1209874/
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2012 14:24:38 GMT
We have had groups of three soldiers patrolling Paris for more than 20 years -- normally the train stations and airports but sometimes out on the street. Back when there was military service, they would be just little 18 year old boys who looked silly with their camouflage and their automatic rifles. Now that there is no conscription, they are a bit older and look more professional. Seeing them seems to shock the tourists (depending on what country they are from), but Parisians do not pay the least bit of attention to them. I'm sure their weapons are not even loaded, because I can't really imagine them spraying the commuters with bullets.
The Mexican soldiers do not look any more ferocious. They're probably just happy to spend a day out of the barracks.
|
|
|
Post by bixaorellana on Jul 7, 2012 16:55:21 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 7, 2012 17:05:07 GMT
That would be pertinent if voter turnout was not so low to begin with, in so many countries in the world.
I am totally in favour of obligatory voting, such as practiced in Brazil, Belgium, Peru, Australia or Singapore.
From what I read, Mexico is one of the numerous countries where voting is obligatory but where the law is not enforced.
|
|
|
Post by mich64 on Jul 7, 2012 18:26:38 GMT
I have been following the Election on the news but I must say I enjoyed your coverage much more! Really well done Bixa and I have learned much from you about the Mexican Political system.
It would seem alarming to me if police had to show up at polling stations here, yet there it almost seemed expected and not to many people seemed surprised or bothered by their presence. It seemed a very emotional election and citizens took this very seriously, doing there best for what they felt best for their country.
|
|
|
Post by bixaorellana on Jul 9, 2012 1:05:28 GMT
I stand by the quote as being pertinent. In countries without compulsory voting, you can be sure that pollsters, area party bosses, campaign directors, & any other interested parties have a pretty good idea of what the turnout might be. Certainly in the US, whenever they need to fill broadcast air during an election, there's much nattering on the actual turnout vs. the expected turnout, etc. I would say those responsible for the voting sites that reported a 300% voter turnout didn't do their homework. Thanks so much, Mich. I wish I knew more about the political system. You really find out when you move to a different country how much people know simply from osmosis -- the osmosis you missed out on because you were absorbing it in a different country. As far as emotional ~~ WHOOOO--EEEEEEE! This was yesterday in Mexico City: Anti-Institutional Revolutionary Party, or anti-PRI, protesters from the opposition movement Yosoy132 (I am 132) gather at the Zocalo square in Mexico City July 7, 2012. Thousands of protesters marched through the Mexican capital on Saturday against President-elect Enrique Pena Nieto, accusing him of buying votes and paying off TV networks for support. The demonstrators, including students, leftists, anarchists and union members, shouted slogans criticizing PRI and the electoral authority. REUTERS/Bernardo Montoya (MEXICO - Tags: POLITICS ELECTIONS CIVIL UNREST) CREDIT: REUTERS PUBLISHED DATE: 07/08/2012photo from fb page "madre moderna"One of the protesters: "I am 90 years old. I have lived through an infinity of plunderings of my beautiful and beloved Mexico. Today the youth give me the energy to be here. I do not want to die without seeing the transformation of public life in my country! Up with the students! Long live Mexico! photo from fb page " Votar por PEÑA Nieto? No estoy pendejo, Mi mamá si tomó su ácido fólicoMore: www.guardian.co.uk/world/2012/jul/08/mexicans-protest-pena-nieto-election?newsfeed=trueMore of same, except with some great pics of the election: www.csmonitor.com/World/Latest-News-Wires/2012/0708/Tens-of-thousands-protest-vote-buying-in-Mexico
|
|
|
Post by fumobici on Jul 9, 2012 1:47:50 GMT
Good to see a big turnout. One can pretty accurately gauge the moral legitimacy of a government by how they react to peaceful protest that is large enough to disrupt 'business as usual'.
|
|
|
Post by bjd on Jul 9, 2012 6:45:33 GMT
Given the many elections taking place these days, I keep wondering why more people don't turn out to vote. I grant that elections don't mean that everything is fine compared to what used to be, but still...
In Libya, for example, or Egypt or wherever there were no "free" elections for years -- why only 60% turnout?
And perhaps a naive question -- but when 300% of the registered voters turn up, or like in Russia where skinheads were bussed from one voting area to another, aren't there some sort of official lists? Do they just barge in and stuff the ballot boxes?
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 9, 2012 10:29:42 GMT
This thread continues to enthrall me. What brilliant coverage Bixa, well done. Did you go to the march in Mexico City?
There is so much to be said about how the process can be finagled so as to effect the outcome of an election. After Hurricane Katrina when more than half of the polling places were flooded and had to be relocated, politicians took major advantage of the chaos. (It still isn't back to normal!!). It created mass confusion for people trying to figure out where they were supposed to go to vote. Despite some effort to broadcast and publish maps in the media, many, many people didn't know where to go. I know, because I was working at the polling place during that time. Many people just gave up in frustration after being shuffled from polling place to polling place.
|
|
|
Post by bixaorellana on Jul 10, 2012 17:21:02 GMT
Thank you all so much for your thoughtful responses to this thread. Apologies for responding so slowly, but I'm continuing to track this & trying to choose the best way to answer your questions. So, please bear with some link-heavy posting from me. One can pretty accurately gauge the moral legitimacy of a government by how they react to peaceful protest that is large enough to disrupt 'business as usual'. Fumo, a retired union organizer from the US claims that the large number of demonstrations (by US standards) are tolerated because they provide an escape valve while political "business as usual" continues. The events of 1968 are not forgotten here, nor more recent violent reactions to civil unrest. There was the dramatic reaction and counter-reaction to the violent overturning of the teachers' encampment in Oaxaca in 2006, which was also the year of the occupation of Mexico City's zócalo in response to the dubious dealings of the federal election board that year. And perhaps a naive question -- but when 300% of the registered voters turn up, or like in Russia where skinheads were bussed from one voting area to another, aren't there some sort of official lists? Do they just barge in and stuff the ballot boxes? I've wondered about that, too, especially since each polling place theoretically has several observers from all the political parties. Casimira provides part of the answer below, proving that disorganization could be a tool to manipulate voting results. Also, there are remote villages where local leaders can probably do as they wish. And you can see in the picture of the booth near my house that it might have been easy enough in such a venue to stuff or switch a ballot box. There is so much to be said about how the process can be finagled so as to effect the outcome of an election. After Hurricane Katrina when more than half of the polling places were flooded and had to be relocated, politicians took major advantage of the chaos. (It still isn't back to normal!!). It created mass confusion for people trying to figure out where they were supposed to go to vote. Yes, a perfect example of how disruption can be turned to political advantage, and perfectly in line with other examples cited in this thread. A major source of frustration for me is finding sources that are well-researched and balanced. Go to google on this subject & award yourself a penny for every time López Obrador is called "leftist". Afterward, if you're not too nauseated by the slanted reporting, you can use the money for a triple-decker ice cream cone or high-end coffee creation. The Guardian has certainly changed its tune since the 2006 election, when AMLO was always referred to rather sneeringly and also as "left-leaning". For the 2012 election it has blown the whistle on unfair practices & continues to give thoughtful, well-researched coverage: www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jul/09/irregularities-reveal-mexico-election-far-from-fairAnd, for those who want to know more, this article is most illuminating on the subject of entrenched corruption: latimesblogs.latimes.com/world_now/2012/07/mexico-congress-vote-members.htmlpee ess ~~ Sorry, Casimira, for forgetting to answer your question. No, I wasn't in MxCity, although that would have been so exhilarating. As a non-citizen, I cannot legally participate in political activity here.
|
|
|
Post by patricklondon on Jul 12, 2012 7:07:07 GMT
Crumbs, that's excitement. Election days in the UK are very quiet. There's occasionally a policeman hanging around some polling stations, though far less than there used to be. Since I usually vote early in the day, there's often no-one else around, just me and the polling clerks).
But at the last General Election, most unusually, there were a couple of places where queues built up late in the day, and some people who hadn't got through the doors before the end of polling were locked out.
And giving people food and drink is an absolute no-no in UK elections - so much so that one of the advantages of being talked into becoming a "paper" candidate in local elections (so that the party has someone for its supporters to vote for, but without any realistic expectation of winning or mounting much of a campaign) is that your election agent will tell you you can't buy anyone a drink after an evening campaigning somewhere winnable - for the whole three weeks or so of the campaign. And if you provide facilities to make tea and coffee for volunteers who come in to stuff envelopes and the like, you have to put out something for them to put some money in for it (even if you don't check whether they do or not).
|
|
|
Post by bjd on Jul 12, 2012 17:04:55 GMT
|
|
|
Post by bixaorellana on Jul 13, 2012 15:41:25 GMT
Patrick, what you describe is how elections should be, right? Admittedly this is much more exciting, but real elections without the stench of corruption would be even more exciting. Of course I always thought my country's polite presidential elections were upstanding, right up until the hanging chads disgrace convinced me otherwise. As far as I can figure out, it doesn't appear to be precisely illegal to buy votes here, only to overspend doing so. I'm confused about this issue, though. Maybe it's not giving the reward until shown proof of a vote in ones favor that would constitute illegal vote buying, whereas giving something as an incentive would not technically be considered vote buying. -?- At any rate, the election is being legally challenged now, www.miamiherald.com/2012/07/12/2893417/leftist-candidate-to-challenge.html, although I hold out little hope nor do I believe that the tribunal that rules on election results is pure. Bjd, thank you SO much for finding & posting that! I'd seen the article & wanted to post it here, but at that time it had the wrong video with it. Very good report & I was happy to finally get to see the video. Googling around today, it would seem that López Obrador is now deemed "the leftist candidate" by all news media.
|
|
|
Post by lola on Jul 13, 2012 16:00:29 GMT
Wonderful thread, bixa. So wanted your guy to win.
Since I deal with the general public on a professional basis and have a good idea of the intelligence range out there, my notion of democracy has shifted from the idealistic Jeffersonian towards John Adamsish.
Well, not quite this far, but per Adams: "Democracy... while it lasts is more bloody than either aristocracy or monarchy. Remember, democracy never lasts long. It soon wastes, exhausts, and murders itself. There is never a democracy that did not commit suicide."
|
|
|
Post by lola on Jul 13, 2012 19:07:22 GMT
Not that I have any realistic alternatives. I guess a republic is as good as it gets. My fantasty monarchs tend to resemble the benign ones in Narnia and Middle Earth.
|
|
|
Post by patricklondon on Jul 15, 2012 19:58:49 GMT
I'd like to think so; but of course with us it mainly depends on the rules being enforced by the parties on each other. A good local election agent will always have an eye open for any opportunity to scare their rivals into good behaviour by simply threatening the complication and expense of possible legal action on even the merest whiff of a breach of any of the rules (and as far as "buying" votes is concerned, it is as illegal to be caught out offering some such incentive, as actually to pay up).
But that's helped by all our elections being, formally speaking, local (i.e., all about the election of an MP for about 100,000 voters, or far fewer for local elections), and therefore any liability falls on relatively small and usually not-well-off local party organisations.
We probably do have problems in some places with false registrations of non-existent voters, combined with it now being very easy to get a postal vote, which leaves wide open opportunities for fraud; on the other hand it's unlikely to be in sufficient numbers to determine the outcome of a national election.
|
|
|
Post by bixaorellana on Jul 17, 2012 6:52:57 GMT
There are two ways to approach elections: 1) Be aware of the possibility of fraud & do everything possible to prevent it. 2) Be aware of the possibility of fraud & do everything possible to turn it to your benefit. It's painfully obvious that two powerful, conservative parties in the US & Mexico, respectively, opted for #2. The stakes are big here, too. Call it cynicism or call it realism, but most if not all people here assume that politicians steal. It's common to hear that Mexico is a poor country, but it's rich in natural resources: wiki.answers.com/Q/What_are_Mexico's_natural_resources If you're fond of reading large amounts of gray text, this article is illuminating. Certainly this paragraph speaks volumes: Pemex is owned and operated by the government. Company leadership changes every six years (tracking presidential term limits) and thus forces a short-term focus on profit making over long-term viability. Until the October 2008 reform, the organization was led by a board of directors consisting of members of the President's cabinet and industry union leaders. The uneasy power sharing between groups holding widely different interests has historically complicated decision making and inhibited the execution of a consistent company vision. Here Calderón, the outgoing president, is supposedly saying, "Take it! Magna [regular lead-free gasoline] at 10.36 pesos* Ha ha ha ha (& I said in 2006 that I'd lower the price of gasoline) & you Mexicans keep voting for us of PRI and of PAN although we give you gasoline rate hikes. That AMLO is crazy. Why build refineries if you all like paying for foreign gasoline?"
* 10.36 pesos = 78 cents US " = .64 Euro " = .50 British Pound " = 80 cents Canadian " = 3,222 Cambodian riels " = 6.42 South African rands
|
|
|
Post by bixaorellana on Jul 22, 2012 6:23:37 GMT
Hooray, hooray ~~ this isn't going away! Nope, the voting public isn't taking this lying down. I took these two pictures on July 18. People were lined up in the rain to sign the petition. The guy with the bullhorn reminded everyone that there was still hope, that all was not lost. There have already been two big marches. Another one is called for tomorrow: More information here, plus Mexican voters can sign the petition online: pocamadrenews.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/mega-marcha-anti-pena-nieto-22-de-julio-al-medio-dia-en-todas-lasplazas-publicas-de-mexico/If you can't access the facebook link from that site, here's a list of cities: Ciudad de México del Ángel a la Independencia al Zócalo 12:00. Concentración en Los Pinos 10 am Monterrey www.facebook.com/events/237708246350096/ 12:00hrs Nueva York www.facebook.com/events/337219803028316/?ref=tsAcapulco www.facebook.com/events/466501376696059/ 15:00 pm Tijuana www.facebook.com/events/394017943994334/ 13:00 pm Can Cun www.facebook.com/events/368256279906239/368352709896596/ 15:00hrs Tlaxcala www.facebook.com/events/385071544896120/ 15:00 pm Pachuca www.facebook.com/events/495265580499254/ 15 hrs Reynosa www.facebook.com/events/448947858471033/ 12:00 hrs San Luis Potosí www.facebook.com/events/448947858471033/León www.facebook.com/events/207995362659427/Cd Madero www.facebook.com/events/296048110492492/Coahulia www.facebook.com/events/495620853786292/ 6:00pm Querétaro www.facebook.com/events/429874310390101/ 12:00 am Quebec, Francia www.facebook.com/events/426953384009555/Los Angeles www.facebook.com/events/407368159308899/Pachuca www.facebook.com/events/495265580499254/ 13:00 hrs Madrid, España: www.facebook.com/events/495916067101846Raleigh, Carolina del Norte, EEUU www.facebook.com/events/326466930777376/Torreón: www.facebook.com/events/246174782166428/Villahermosa Tabasco www.facebook.com/events/407077042663366/ 16:00 pm Plaza de la Revoluición Tabasco 2000 Tehuacán, Puebla la cita es a las 15:30 hrs del dia domingo 22 de julio Ciudad del Carmen: 22 de julio, 17:30 hrs, Parque frente a Panteón Viejo Ciudad Juárez: 22 de julio, 14:00 hs., del Parque Borunda a la Plaza de Armas Coatzacoalcos: 21 de julio, 4:00 pm (?) Durango: 22 de julio, 15:00 hs., Liperpool Ensenada: 22 de julio, 17:00 hs., Monumento Lázaro Cárdenas a Parque Revolución Hermosillo: 22 de julio 17:00 hs., Soriana Encinas Lázaro Cárdenas: 22 de julio, 16:00 hs., Parque Glorieta de las Torres León: 22 de julio, 14:30 hs., Arco de la Calzada Mérida: 22 de julio, 17:00, Plaza Grande Mexicali: 22 de julio, 18:00 hs., Jardines Rectoría UABC Oaxaca: 22 de julio, 10:00 hs., Mercado Santa Rosa San Luis Potosí: 22 de julio, 12:30 hs, de Morales a Aranzazu Tlaxcala: 21 de julio, 15:00 hs., Zócalo de Tlaxcala de Xicoténcatl Torreón, 22 de julio, 12:00 hs., Monumento Torreón Amsterdam, Holanda: 22 de julio, 13:00 a 16:00 hs., Plazas Beursplein y EindhovenCalgary, Canadá: 22 de julio, 11:00 hs., Consulado Mexicano Dallas, Texas, Estados Unidos: 22 de julio, 12:00 a 15:00 hs., Consulado de México Madrid: 22 de julio, 17:00 hs., Plaza del Callao Nueva York, Estados Unidos: 22 de julio, 16:30 hs., E Houston St & Broadway (afuera de la Adidas) www.facebook.com/events/337219803028316/Quebec, Canadá: Pershing Square. 532 S Olive St, Los Ángeles 90013, 22 de julio, 14:00 hs.
|
|