|
|
Post by gyro on Mar 4, 2009 6:47:58 GMT
Does anybody else have problems with the 'homepage' not being accurate on the last post in branches?
Quite often, when I scroll down the list of branches, the time and poster who last added to a thread in that branch is incorrect, and if I go in, I'll find more recent posts.
|
|
|
|
Post by gyro on Mar 4, 2009 6:49:22 GMT
... for example, in here, it is still telling me Bix was the last poster at 6.32am. Which, obviously, is incorrect.
|
|
|
|
Post by happytraveller on Mar 4, 2009 6:59:09 GMT
Yep, I've noticed that too !
|
|
|
|
Post by gyro on Mar 4, 2009 6:59:42 GMT
Note To Mods: This is NOT a criticism .......
|
|
|
|
Post by bixaorellana on Mar 4, 2009 7:04:57 GMT
~?~
I'm posting this 4 minutes after you wrote it. On the home page it tells me that HappyTraveller was the last poster in "funny little story" at 1 a.m. (my time -- it's 1:04 my time right now)
I haven't had the problem you all describe. Has this been happening very long?
|
|
|
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 4, 2009 7:16:32 GMT
I think that the space-time continuum may have finally become irreparably damaged. I am hoping to find myself 20 years younger at any moment.
|
|
|
|
Post by gyro on Mar 4, 2009 7:21:15 GMT
Thanks for your input.
Bix; I've only really noticed it lately - last day or so.
|
|
|
|
Post by bixaorellana on Mar 4, 2009 7:28:01 GMT
Hmmm. will look into it. Are you & you, Happy, both using IE?
|
|
|
|
Post by happytraveller on Mar 4, 2009 7:30:26 GMT
I am using IE.
By the way, I think it might be a proboard problem, I have it at TTR too.
|
|
|
|
Post by bixaorellana on Mar 4, 2009 7:37:11 GMT
Thanks Happy. It's been reported.
|
|
|
|
Post by happytraveller on Mar 4, 2009 7:42:46 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by palesa on Mar 4, 2009 7:55:18 GMT
*hand up* I have also been having that problem. IE.
|
|
|
|
Post by bixaorellana on Mar 4, 2009 7:57:17 GMT
*mutters* I TOLD y'all firefox was better!
|
|
|
|
Post by gyro on Mar 4, 2009 8:06:59 GMT
I used to have it on another forum too. But I though mentioning it's NAME would be waaaaay too inflammatory and against The Rules.
|
|
|
|
Post by palesa on Mar 4, 2009 8:08:27 GMT
Actually the reason I do not use FF, is it does not support at least 3 applications that I use every day for work, one is one is the our business online banking, it offers only limited access to our intranet and I can't remember the other one .....
|
|
|
|
Post by bixaorellana on Mar 4, 2009 8:08:34 GMT
I believe Happy did. She did it without being a twerp, though, which would be hard for you.
|
|
|
|
Post by bixaorellana on Mar 4, 2009 8:10:00 GMT
Reallly Palesa? Are you using the most recent version?
|
|
|
|
Post by palesa on Mar 4, 2009 8:15:50 GMT
Yep, most recent version. I called the bank and they said that many of their clients have had problems so they suggest I continue to use IE and I have not followed up with our IT people about intranet, oh it is not intranet, sorry, it is our web based mail server that only offers a basic version of outlook on FF but a full version on IE.
|
|
|
|
Post by gyro on Mar 4, 2009 8:41:36 GMT
Yeah, sorry Bix, I'm missing page 17 of the Posting Rules Appendix.
|
|
|
|
Post by happytraveller on Mar 4, 2009 9:10:51 GMT
You know, I'm a little rebel...
I have no choice between firefox or IE, not here at work. It would be a bit rude to go and complain I think ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by onlymark on Mar 4, 2009 9:35:17 GMT
Yeah, sorry Bix, I'm missing page 17 of the Posting Rules Appendix. You've run out of toilet paper again? |
|
|
|
Post by gyro on Mar 4, 2009 9:41:13 GMT
Now now, Mark ......
|
|
